'Principality of Camside' in court again
The judgment of the Federal Court in Australian Prudential Regulation Authority v Siminton (No 6) [2007] FCA 1608 is good for a few laughs, but the website of the purported 'Principality of Camside' is even better. It's right up there with the last batch of quasi-legal mumbo-jumbo and insanity that I blogged about.
Their declarations of war are particularly good... Oh, and they claim that by virtue of the fact that the Commonwealth failed to send in the army when they declared war back in March 2003, they won by default and now own Australia (with the exception of the Hutt River Province, of course):
Their declarations of war are particularly good... Oh, and they claim that by virtue of the fact that the Commonwealth failed to send in the army when they declared war back in March 2003, they won by default and now own Australia (with the exception of the Hutt River Province, of course):
The law relating to the Declaration of War, state, that if the country on which war has been declared (Australia), fails to turn up to battle, the country that declared war (Principality of Camside), is declared the winner. For this legal reason, the "spoils of war," namely the Australian National Estate, Crown Land, roads and freeways, are now the property and responsibility of the Principality of Camside.Nuttier than a case full of squirrels.
These property spoils of war, however, exclude the sovereign lands already declared as the sovereign independent lands of Hutt River Province.
The Principality of Camside is now be legally referred to as Her Majesty's Government of Camside, as another of the consequences of the Principality of Camside having won by default, the war that they declared on the now defunct, abdicated and defeated Commonwealth of Australia.
Leave a comment